Safety Car at Italian Grand Prix 2022: Why anti-climatic finish which provoked anger was correct

An anti-climatic finish to F1’s Italian Grand Prix may have provoked an angry response from a partisan home crowd, but the correct procedure was followed. 
Max Verstappen (NLD)
Max Verstappen (NLD)

With the race fizzling out and Max Verstappen seemingly on course to ease to his fifth successive victory with Charles Leclerc’s📖 Ferrari covered off, it looked as though a grandstand finish could be on the cards when Daniel Ricciardo’s McLaren stopped on Lap 47.꧟ 

A 168澳洲幸运5官方开奖结果历史:Safety Car was deployed on the following lap and the frontrunners subsequently pitted for soft tyres anticipating a restart, but a combination issues clearing away Ricciardo’s stricken car, plus the Safety Car initially picking up George Rus𝐆sell instead of Verstappen, meant a sprint to the finish was denied. 

Remote video URL

Why the ending was correct 

Unlike the controversial ending to the 2021 168澳洲幸运5官方开奖结果历史:Abu Dhabi Grand Prix, the༒ finish at Monza followed the right protocol. 🙈;

Had there been enough la꧑ps, the backmarkers  💫;would have been allowed to overtake the Safety Car and catch up to the back of the train. A restart would have then occurred at the end of the following lap. 

Max Verstappen (NLD) Red Bull Racing RB18 leads behind the Aston Martin FIA Safety Car. Formula 1 World Championship, Rd
Max Verstappen (NLD) Red Bull Racing RB18 leads behind the Aston Martin FIA Safety Car…

But time ultimately ran out for such a scenario to occur, largely due ൲to struggles to remove Ri🍒cciardo’s McLaren because his car was stuck in gear, as well as the field taking a while to bunch up. 

That meant Verstappen won from 💙Leclerc, who was denied the chance to attack the Red Bull driver at the end, with the crowd responding to the result with a chorus of deafening boos. 

“While every effort was made to recover Car #3 quickly and res🍌ume racing, the situation developed and marshals were unable to put the car into neutral and push it into the 🤪escape road,” an FIA statement read. 

“As the safety of the recovery operation🔥 is our only priority, and the incident was not significant enough to require a red flag, the race ended under safety car following the procedures agreed between the FIA and all Competitors. The timing of the safety car period within a race has no bearing on this procedure.” 

How it differed to the 2021 Abu Dhabi 

Former FIA race director Michael Masi lost his job for the way he mishandle꧙d the controversial showdown in Abu Dhabi last year, with his actions directly altering the outcome of the world championship. 

Masi’s decision to force a one-lap shootout enabled Verstappen to overtake Hamilton on the final tour and snatch the cham🍌pionship in the most dramatic of fi꧂nishes. 

Safety Car, Lewis Hamilton (GBR), Mercedes AMG
Safety Car, Lewis Hamilton (GBR), Mercedes AMG

The Australian had come under pressure 🐲from both the Mercedes and Red Bull camps and ultimately failed to correctly apply the rules in two ways. The first was to only partially follow the rules around unlapping, while he also failed to follow the correc🎉t procedure regarding the timing of the restart, by restarting the race a lap early. 

Mercedes boss Toto Wolff couldn't 168澳洲幸运5官方开奖结果历史:resist a r🔯eference to the ✱events of Abu Dhabi after the race. 

"The race direction is going to be ꧒under critics but this time, they followed the ru🔴les," he told Sky.

Read More