Ex-F1 steward: Max Verstappen penalty should have been double
Max Verstappen deserved a more s🎃evere penalty in the Saudi Arabian Grand Prix, an ex-F1 steward has claimed.

168澳洲幸运5官方开奖结果历史:Max Verstappen’s penalty at the Saudi Arabian Grand Prix should have been more severe in the view of ex-F1 steward Johnny Herbert.
The Red Bull driver was handed a five-second time penalty for leaving the track and gaining an advantage in a first-corner incident with McLaren’s168澳洲幸运5官方开奖结果历史: Oscar Piastri during Sunday’s race in Jeddah.
Verstappen, starting from pole position, swung around the outside of Piastri ಞand cut Turn 1 in order to retain track position over the Australian, who had𒆙 got a better launch from the grid.
The four-time world champion served his penalty during his only pit stop, which dropped him behind Piast꧅ri and into second, where he would ultimately finish.
Such offences usually occur a 10-second time penalty but the stewards ไwere more lenient with the punishment considering it was the first co🅺rner of the opening lap.
How💜ever, ex-F1 driver Herbert - who was axed as an FIA steward ahead of the 2025 season due to his work being deemed “incompatible” with his role as a media pundit - felt Verstꦿappen deserved the baseline penalty.
"Max Verstappen's inc🌜ident with Oscar Piastri on Turn 1 was a pen𒁏alty,” Herbert told .
“These are the best drivers in the wꦿorld, they have the best judgement and the best awareness, so if you're making an overtake into Turn 1, but you completely go off track then it’s a ten-second penalty, but a five-second penalty was applied and I’m not a fan of t🌼his.
“Especially if you take the lead like Verstappen did, you can potentially gain that five seconds back quite easily as it has happened before. So, if you can gain the five seconds back by not giving the place back, then wh⭕at's the point in a pena♎lty?
"It was a definite penalty, because when you go into any corner, especially a tight one like that, you'🀅ve got to be on the apex near the curb. The apex of the t💫urn was not where Verstappen was, who was two metres out.
“▨When you're going around the outside with a driver on the inside, your angle of attack into the next turn diminishes massively. It was Piastri's corner and he could place the car wherever he wanted to. Max overshot the corner by releasing the brakes, to try to beat Oscar into Turn 1 whilst car🍬rying lots of speed.”

Max Verstappen should have ‘conceded the corner’
Herbert b🐽elieves Verstappen should have simply conceded the corner at the start.
"Christian Horner and others are saying 'is Verstappen supposed to just vanish?', well, no, he can’t ju🥀st vanish but he should have conceded the corner and slipped behind Piastri,” he said.
“James Hunt said to me in my early years of F1 thꦑat 'sometimes it’s better to concede the corner if the corner is lost' and that’s exactly what happened and that's when you slip behind the car you’re trying to overtake.
"Verstappen claiming he's been pushed off over the radio is a message to the Race Director to take a look, then he'll ask the stewards to look into it if he feels it needs investigating. It only went to the stewards because Verstappen gained an advantage and stayed𓄧 in front.
“The s💜tewards will abide by the racing guidelines, which are set in stone befoꦰre the race weekend. They are agreed with the teams, drivers, and the Race Director.
“The drivers want the stewards to use these guidelines, and Max and all♔ his fellow drivers would have agreed to them too. So there can't be any complaints from Red Bull.
“The driver on the outside has to give the driver on the inside space. Max did give space, but he went off tr🐠ack and gained an advantage.”
Red Bull handled incident ‘wrong’

Red Bull were left angered by the decision, prompting team principal Christian Horner to168澳洲幸运5官方开奖结果历史: print out evidence in a bid to dispute the penalty.
Although Red Bull decided🔯 against formally protesting the verdict, Herbert was critical of their approach and how they handled the situation.
"Horner then came up with the picture of evidence to show who was in front inও Turn 1, which was a load of baloney, but to me, it was passing the buck to the FIA and the stewards,” he continued.
“It's wrong, it shoಌuldn't be like that. Red Bull had a chance to giv🍨e the place back but they chose not to. Kimi Antonelli did something very similar with Charles Leclerc, same corner, same lap, but he gave the position back.
“If Verstappen had given the position back, he probably would have won the race, but instead, they took a risky strategy ofꦓ trying to get the five-second penalty ✱by being at the front with a clear track.
“If it was the speedy Red Bull car f🙈rom two or three years ago, they would have probably gotten away with it, but the McLaren and Piastri were able to keep up.
“"I'm not a fan of this rule, but because it's deemed the first lap is harder to jud🐓ge, the stewards will only use a five-second penalty due to litigate🤪d circumstances, I think it should always be the standard ten-second penalty.
"It should always be the same, if you move the rules aroun♛d, then it opens a can of worms. They're the best drivers in the world, they know where to brakeꦿ and accelerate, he gained an advantage, full stop.”

Lewis regularly attends Grands Prix for mahbx.com aroun♏d the world. Often reporting on the action from the ground, Lewis tells the stories of the people who matter in the sport.