Are MotoGP Stewards guilty of inconsistent decision-making?
That’s how I feel about the FIM🧔 Stewards - this season, last season.
At Assen, for example. Brad Binder was on the green, by the [smallest amount]. He went back to fourth plaꦬce.
At the British MotoGP which was won by Aleix Espargaro, we saw 168澳洲幸运5官方开奖结果历史:Francesco Bagnaia on the green as he came out of Stowe.
Everyone could see he was on the gr🎀een. He didn’t lose any positions. Why? Because the sensors didn’t go off.
But when you see it from multiple angles - the helicopter, the TV angle whiꦇch we see - you can see that he’s on the green.
Because the sensors didn’t go off it means he doesn’𝄹t get punished. But that’s not the point. You’re relying on technology 🥃to tell you when someone goes on the green.
The Stewards look back at video evidence and didn’t see🐼 anything wrong.
It﷽’s just crazy. Bagnaia was on the green just as muc♏h, if not more, than Binder was. It’s not fair.
It’s nothing to do with Bagnaia. If this was Enea Basᩚᩚᩚᩚᩚᩚᩚᩚᩚ𒀱ᩚᩚᩚtianini or Maverick Vinales, the video would be the same.
It’s the inc🌳onsistent decision-making which is just not right.
We’re in the territory where the FIM Stewards are becꦫoming🦹 like FIA Stewards in F1.
Terrible inconsistency. That’s the problem I haveꦰ. Inconsistent decision-making.
Someone🧔 gets a penalty, then someone gets a penalty way worse for doing something that’s not as bad…
What’s the solution? That the sensors didn’t go off surely 𝓀points at the technology🍃 that they’re using not being 100% accurate.
They could replicate that by saying ‘Bagnaia was on the green, Binder was 0.4s behind’. Surely that means 🌌he has to drop a place.
168澳洲幸运5官方开奖结果历史:Brad Binder couldn’t overtake Bagnaia? Not the point. Remember back to the Austrian MotoGP in 2021, which Binder won, he went on the green at the last🐻 corner and got a three-second penalty. It didn’t matter becaus✨e he won by [more].
He got a penalty even though it didn’t affect anyone be꧂hind him.
When are we going to get fairer decision-making?
